

Fickleness: Thy Name Is "Employee"
WHAT ARE YOUR
EMPLOYEES doing between noon and two p.m.? If you think they are munching
sandwiches behind closed doors, think again.
Chances are,
more than a few are logged onto the Internet, surfing for jobs. According
to CareerMosaic, the largest job-posting service outside the U.S. Government,
its site is visited almost four million times a month – with the heaviest
frequency on Mondays and Tuesdays between noon and two. (Absence from work
over the weekend does not, apparently, make the employee heart grow fonder.)
Four million
visits does not equal four million visitors, since hard-core job-seekers
may return to the site several times each week, but it still represents
a lot of traffic. And CareerMosaic is but one of many such job sites constituting
the electronic classifieds of the ‘nineties.
Your employees
may be heeding the advice of a current newspaper ad from the search firm
Korn/Ferry International, whose headline reads:
BEING IN LOVE
WITH YOUR JOB
DOESN’T MEAN
YOU CAN’T FLIRT
WITH A FEW
OPPORTUNITIES.
And when an
old-line search firm begins advertising for candidates, skilled employees
know they are in heavy demand. Those who feel disloyal or insecure, however,
about responding to jobs on the World Wide Web – or who may even be in
love with their current job – do not have to worry about missing the Big
Opportunity. It will find them, thanks to the "old-fashioned" breed of
executive recruiters who know how to locate people whose resumes are not
in play.
Some mega-corporations
not only expect attrition, they actually encourage it – trying to weed
out those whose careers have peaked. Several, in fact, have created a job
bank that allows the expendable employee from Company A to investigate
job possibilities at Company B.
In most organizations,
though, attrition – especially of the unplanned variety – is more disruptive
than productive. You may be furiously sending signals to the bottom ten
percent that you’d dearly love to see them leave, but there is no guarantee
(short of firing) that they will be the ones to do so. The increasing propensity
of many companies to heap lavish counter-offers on those who have tendered
their resignation reflects the difficulties today of finding qualified
replacements, not to mention the costs of hiring and training them.
How to Build
a More Stable Workforce
Marketers
use a term called "switching costs," which simply means the direct or indirect
cost, if any, of switching from one brand or provider to another. If, for
example, you purchase your car from that rare dealer with evening and weekend
service hours, there may be a cost to you in terms of convenience if you
buy your next car from a dealer with traditional service hours.
This principle
can be used to great effect in building employee retention. Another employer
can always come along and offer one of your employees a fatter salary –
but what will the employee give up in order to accept it? In the celebrated
case of the Atlanta consulting firm that recently bought every employee
a BMW, the switching cost is obvious. Less dramatic and less costly ways,
however, may work as well.
Companies,
for example, try to offer competitive benefits packages – meaning that
they are little better or worse than what similar companies appear to offer.
While that approach may neutralize the appeal of a competitor’s benefits,
it also means your employees may leave precious little behind by jumping
ship. An alternative approach might be to select one key benefit and enhance
it, such as the co-pay provisions or deductible on a group health-insurance
plan, the company match on the 401(K) plan or the treatment of unused vacation.
Another approach is to survey employees to determine the one missing piece
of your benefits package that they would most value receiving – dental
coverage, vision care, a medical savings plan, etc. The widespread use
today of cafeteria plans allows many employers to increase the range of
benefit options without significantly increasing costs.
"Soft" benefits,
such as a day-care center, also can be used to demonstrate an employee-friendly
environment – even to those who may not have need of the service. Working
Mother magazine recently honored a select list of large corporations that
have established formal programs to track the career progress of working
moms. On a smaller scale, one innovative company has established a "personal
shopper" service that frees employees from the tyranny of grocery shopping
(and probably results in their working longer hours).
At the individual
employee level, most business organizations do a more diligent job of criticizing
employee weaknesses than they do of saying thanks for a job well done.
Managers in even the smallest of units or remotest of facilities can assume
responsibility for correcting the imbalance by instituting employee-recognition
programs. These may be no more elaborate than a thank-you letter (with
copy for the personnel file), a company-paid dinner for two or an extra
vacation day at the end of an important project.
Targeting
the Key Employee
As the pig
said in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, "All animals are equal, but some are
more equal than others." Certain of your employees are more equal than
others by virtue of position or performance – and they are exactly the
people in your organization whom recruiters are trying to target.
You should
keep them in your sights as well. The mission with the key employee is
threefold: to remove any hidden irritations, to create a visible career
path and to encourage tenure through creative long-term compensation plans.
As we have
said in these pages before, executive search consultants know one great
truth: employees who change jobs have some kind of dissatisfaction with
their current work situation that their employer has failed to address.
It may be money, but more likely it is elsewhere in the hierarchy of needs
– a lack of recognition, a lack of perceived upward mobility, an overbearing
or indecisive boss, a lack of "perks" (from larger office to company car),
or – worse yet – a nagging concern about the company’s future or sense
of direction. Any performance review worth its salt should provide ample
opportunity for the employee to express his or her concerns and desires.
As an ample
number of court cases have demonstrated, the employee who is promised a
job for life will certainly have one. So never promise what you can’t deliver
– or later may not want to deliver. Instead, demonstrate your interest
in a key employee through faster than average promotion (or lateral "broadening"),
bigger than average salary increases, expanded responsibilities and high-visibility
assignments. Your thoroughbreds don’t want to be stuck in the stables,
unable to show their stuff.
Finally, there
are a wide range of deferred compensation options that can build long-term
commitment to the organization while making it costly for the key executive
to change jobs: for example, stock options, restricted stock grants, multi-year
incentive plans, forgivable loans, split-dollar life insurance policies,
etc. Companies that fail to take advantage of them do so at their peril.
(For a fuller discussion, see our July 1997 issue, "How Attractive Is Your
Compensation Plan?")
Why Are We
Bringing You This Message?
Executive
search consultants succeed or fail on their ability, day in and day out,
to extract top performers from organizations just like yours. But top-drawer
firms like Sanford Rose Associates build long-lasting practices by developing
long-lasting partnerships with important clients whose needs we serve over
many years.
If one of
your people flirts with another job and takes it, we certainly stand ready
to help you fill the void. More important, however, we want to see the
people we put into your organization stay and contribute to its growth.
As long as our clients grow, we’ll never run out of search assignments
(or other companies to recruit from) – and that’s motivation enough to
share these thoughts.

Use This Checklist for a Successful Interview
EVERY COMPANY CONDUCTS THEM, and every candidate endures them. We’re speaking a- bout interviews, of course. They are the most critical part of the hiring process, and the future of both the organization and the job candidate can rest on the outcome. Yet, for all their importance, far too many interviews are cobbled together – instead of thoughtfully planned and carefully executed.
Over the past four decades, the search consultants of Sanford Rose Associates have debriefed companies and candidates on thousands upon thousands of "face-to-face" job interviews, from the almost flawless to the hopelessly flawed. During that time, some critical elements of successful interviews have emerged.
While the following checklist will not guarantee a perfect interviewing process, it may help your organization avoid a fiasco. And if we have omitted what you believe to be a crucial detail, please take the time to tell us about it.
Before the Visit
Interviews are opportunities for companies to gain information and insight about candidates – and vice versa. That opportunity can be wasted by focusing on detail readily available from the resume itself (e.g., "What is your current position," "What were your major accomplishments," etc.), as opposed to learning what makes the candidate tick (e.g., "Tell me how you typically manage conflict").
Interviews need not be stressful, but they should create opportunities to observe job-related performance attributes. Thus, the candidate for a public relations job might be asked to write a press release about the company’s most recent earnings report, while the candidate for a general-management position with frequent Board exposure might undergo questioning by a small group of people in a conference room to test his/her persuasiveness.
And why does the candidate trudge from interview to interview throughout the day? Defenders cite the need for consensus decision-making. Detractors make subversive comments about "safety in numbers" and "no one gets all the blame." If your organization believes in interview panels, assemble one that makes sense for the open position – e.g., the hiring manager, the hiring manager’s boss, a human resources professional and two or three people from other departments who interact frequently with the position.
To gain control of the interview process:
Candidates for certain positions require the top person’s blessing. In these situations:
Ó
1999 SRA International, Inc. All rights reserved. This SRA Update is published
for the clients of Sanford Rose Associates. "Dimensional Search" and "Sanford
Rose Associates" are registered service marks.
